Key findings from detailed records
Population: 30 adults without major psychiatric disorders Findings: Some sleep subscales differed from placebo. Results also included within-group changes and cognitive findings in subgroups.
KNOWLEDGE RECORD
- Category
- Sleep and stress
- Last Reviewed
Names and related search termsL-Theanine / L-Theanine / Theanine / Theanine
Study type: human intervention study.
OUTCOME-SPECIFIC EVIDENCE
Scientific Evidence Profile
Assessment pending
An outcome-specific assessment has not yet been completed. This is not a finding that the ingredient is ineffective. The study records below remain available.
This profile concerns the stated outcome and population, not the ingredient as a whole. It is not a probability of benefit, a safety rating, a product efficacy rating or an indication of product adoption.
How we assess evidenceIngredient Profile
- What is it?
- L-theanine is an amino-acid derivative found in tea. Chemically, it is an ethyl derivative of glutamine; it is distinct from caffeine. [1]
Sources for this profile
Compound properties and formulation properties are different. These sources do not establish the efficacy of a finished supplement.
- PubChem — L-Theanine (CID 439378) Chemical identity reference. Maintained by NCBI, U.S. National Library of Medicine. Database record; not a clinical trial.
Profile sources checked:
Read the evidence in context
- Evidence: what was measured in the stated population or experimental model.
- Inference: an interpretation connecting findings; its applicability depends on the study conditions.
- Hypothesis: a proposed explanation or effect that remains to be tested.
Why It Matters #
How should subjective changes in sleep and stress be interpreted? Check the detailed records for study conditions and use the literature map to compare other populations and outcomes.
What Was Studied #
Thirty adults without major psychiatric disorders participated in a randomized, double-blind crossover trial. Clinical assessments covered mood, sleep and cognitive tasks.[1]
What Was Found #
Some sleep subscales differed from placebo. Results also included within-group changes and cognitive findings in subgroups.[1]
What the Evidence Means #
Small sample, multiple outcomes and short duration. Not every improvement can be described as an effect versus placebo.[1]
Comparing similar populations, formulations, durations and outcomes helps identify where findings agree and where they differ.
What We Can Learn #
Distinguish “better than before intake” from “better than control.” The study does not establish treatment effects for insomnia or psychiatric disorders.
What Remains Unknown #
Further questions include reproducibility across populations and formulations, and the long-term balance of benefits and harms. Use the literature map as a starting point for these questions.
LITERATURE MAP / 10 PAPERS
Compare papers by conditions and findings.
A literature map covering different populations, outcomes and formulations. Read alongside detailed records to avoid treating one trial as the conclusion for an entire ingredient.
Selected: 2026-09-21. Bibliographic information checked against Europe PMC / PubMed. Editorial selection considered major papers and a range of populations and questions. This is not a systematic search covering all recent research.
10 RECORDS
A dash marks fields outside the bibliographic record. Use detailed records to compare findings and design records to connect mechanisms.
No papers match. Change the search conditions.
The literature map is an index of research questions and references. Individual assessment of results, doses, funding and COI is limited to the detailed study records. Related reports from the same trial may be included; paper counts are not counts of independent trials.
Explore the research Study Records
Listed doses describe study conditions, not recommended intake.
Effects of L-Theanine Administration on Stress-Related Symptoms and Cognitive Functions in Healthy Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
PubMed 31623400DOI: 10.3390/nu11102362
- Authors
- Hidese S, Ogawa S, Ota M, Ishida I, Yasukawa Z, Ozeki M, Kunugi H.
- Journal
- Nutrients
- Publication year
- 2019
- Study design
- Randomized, double-blind crossover trial
- Participants
- 30 adults without major psychiatric disorders
- Dose and intervention
- L-Theanine 200 mg/day
- Duration
- 4 weeks per condition
- Outcomes and their role in the study
- Clinical assessments (depression, anxiety, sleep and cognitive tests) are grouped as primary outcomes in the Methods. Biomarkers are secondary outcomes.
- Findings
- Some sleep subscales differed from placebo. Results also included within-group changes and cognitive findings in subgroups.
- Limitations
- Small sample, multiple outcomes and short duration. No apparent adverse events were reported during the 4-week interventions. Before-and-after changes and exploratory subgroup findings are distinct from overall placebo-controlled effects.
- Funding
- Taiyo Kagaku funded the study and supplied the study tablets.
- Conflict of Interest
- Yasukawa and Ozeki were Taiyo Kagaku employees.
- Scope of source review
- Primary full text checked for participants, intervention, results, limitations, funding and conflicts of interest on 2026-10-24.
Cite this page
LÍFSVARÐA. L-Theanine: How should subjective changes in sleep and stress be interpreted? Version 1.1 / Updated 2026-10-24
https://lifsvarda.com/knowledge/l-theanine/Edited by LÍFSVARÐA (product brand).Editorial policy
Sources and updates
- Hidese S, Ogawa S, Ota M, Ishida I, Yasukawa Z, Ozeki M, Kunugi H. (2019). Effects of L-Theanine Administration on Stress-Related Symptoms and Cognitive Functions in Healthy Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Primary full text checked for participants, intervention, results, limitations, funding and conflicts of interest on 2026-10-24.
First published: 2026-09-21 / Version 1.1. Updated 2026-09-23: Added a research comparison table and links to design records. Source notes identify the scope of verification when the full paper has not been reviewed. Research summaries and LÍFSVARÐA’s interpretation are distinguished.
