Key findings from detailed records
Small trials report changes in subjective fatigue or sleep, but stress-hormone findings are not consistent. Safety interpretation depends on dose, salt form and the completeness of adverse-event reporting.
KNOWLEDGE RECORD
- Category
- Sleep and stress
- Last Reviewed
- 2026-09-27
Names and related search termsOrnithine; L-ornithine hydrochloride; ornithine HCl; urea cycle
OUTCOME-SPECIFIC EVIDENCE
Scientific Evidence Profile
Assessment pending
An outcome-specific assessment has not yet been completed. This is not a finding that the ingredient is ineffective. The study records below remain available.
This profile concerns the stated outcome and population, not the ingredient as a whole. It is not a probability of benefit, a safety rating, a product efficacy rating or an indication of product adoption.
How we assess evidenceIngredient Profile
- What is it?
- L-ornithine is a non-proteinogenic amino acid. “Amino acid” describes a chemical class; it does not mean every member is incorporated into proteins. [1]
Sources for this profile
Compound properties and formulation properties are different. These sources do not establish the efficacy of a finished supplement.
- PubChem — L-(-)-Ornithine (CID 6262) Chemical identity reference. Maintained by NCBI, U.S. National Library of Medicine. Database record; not a clinical trial.
Profile sources checked:
Read the evidence in context
- Evidence: what was measured in the stated population or experimental model.
- Inference: an interpretation connecting findings; its applicability depends on the study conditions.
- Hypothesis: a proposed explanation or effect that remains to be tested.
Why It Matters #
Ornithine is a non-protein amino acid involved in the urea cycle, which helps dispose of nitrogen as urea. This physiological role explains interest in ammonia handling and fatigue. It does not establish that extra ornithine improves everyday function in people with normal nitrogen metabolism.
What Was Studied #
Healthy-adult studies include 400 mg/day for eight weeks in mildly stressed workers and 1,600 mg/day for seven days before a laboratory stress test. Exercise experiments have used larger short-term doses. Clinical L-ornithine L-aspartate treatment in liver disease is a different formulation and population, not direct evidence for routine plain ornithine use.[1][2][3]
What Was Found #
The eight-week trial reported improvements in selected subjective sleep/stress measures and cortisol-related measures. The later acute-stress study did not find a cortisol effect, although some next-day mood/fatigue measures favored ornithine. The results therefore do not consistently confirm one stress-hormone mechanism.[1][2]
A small exercise crossover trial used 2 g/day of ornithine hydrochloride for seven days and 6 g on the test day; subgroup and subjective findings should not be treated as a replicated general performance advantage.[3]
What the Evidence Means #
Subjective fatigue is a relevant experience, but it is distinct from objective sleep architecture, endurance or preserved function over years. Short studies and several questionnaire outcomes increase the need for prespecified endpoints and independent replication.
What We Can Learn #
A 2025 safety review included 22 articles, but 13 did not report adverse-event information. Gastrointestinal symptoms were the main reported problem. Its 12 g/day no-observed-adverse-effect estimate refers to the hydrochloride salt under studied conditions, approximately 9.4 g of ornithine—not a recommended lifelong dose. The longest study used a different ornithine form.[5][6]
What Remains Unknown #
Whether the reported sleep and fatigue changes persist, improve objective function and reproduce outside industry-associated trials remains uncertain. Better studies should separate free ornithine from its salts and combinations and report adverse events systematically, including participants who stop treatment.
LITERATURE MAP / 10 PAPERS
Compare papers by conditions and findings.
Compare populations, preparations, doses and outcomes. Detailed records below assess selected studies; the remaining entries provide a bibliographic route into related questions.
Selected: 2026-09-27. Bibliographic information checked against Europe PMC / PubMed. This editorial selection includes major trials, evidence syntheses and different research questions; it is not an exhaustive systematic review. Paper counts are not counts of independent trials.
10 RECORDS
A dash marks fields not assessed in a bibliographic-only record.
No papers match. Change the search conditions.
Explore the research Study Records
Listed doses describe study conditions, not recommended intake.
Randomised controlled trial of the effects of L-ornithine on stress markers and sleep quality in healthy workers.
PubMed 24889392 DOI: 10.1186/1475-2891-13-53
- Authors
- Miyake M, Kirisako T, Kokubo T, Miura Y, Morishita K, Okamura H, Tsuda A.
- Journal
- Nutrition journal
- Publication year
- 2014
- Study design
- Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
- Participants
- 52 healthy Japanese workers with mild fatigue/stress
- Dose and intervention
- L-ornithine 400 mg/day versus placebo
- Duration
- 8 weeks
- Outcomes and their role in the study
- Subjective sleep and mood; cortisol and cortisol/DHEA-S ratio
- Findings
- Selected sleep/anger measures and cortisol-related measures favored ornithine.
- Limitations
- Small sample, subjective outcomes and multiple measures; not a sleep-disorder treatment trial.
- Funding
- Kirin and Kyowa-related study/product support.
- Conflict of Interest
- Authors included Kirin employees; Kirin was affiliated with the ingredient supplier Kyowa. The paper reported no personal conflicts.
- What We Can Learn
- Subjective signals merit replication with objective sleep and functional endpoints.
- Scope of source review
- Original full text and bibliographic record reviewed.
Effects of Oral Ingestion of L-Ornithine on Mental Stress and Fatigue Based on the Trier Social Stress Test in Healthy Humans: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Trial.
PubMed 39768508 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13247583
- Authors
- Moriyasu K, Nakajima A, Morita M.
- Journal
- Journal of clinical medicine
- Publication year
- 2024
- Study design
- Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled stress-challenge trial
- Participants
- 65 participants randomized
- Dose and intervention
- L-ornithine 1,600 mg/day versus placebo before a Trier Social Stress Test
- Duration
- 7 days before testing; next-day assessment
- Outcomes and their role in the study
- Cortisol stress response; mood and fatigue questionnaires
- Findings
- No significant cortisol effect; selected next-day fatigue and anger scores improved.
- Limitations
- Short intervention, laboratory stress context and several subjective endpoints.
- Funding
- Kirin funded the work; Kyowa provided the study ingredient.
- Conflict of Interest
- Two authors were Kirin employees.
- What We Can Learn
- A mood signal did not confirm a cortisol-mediated explanation.
- Scope of source review
- Original full text and bibliographic record reviewed.
Safety assessment of L-ornithine oral intake in healthy subjects: a systematic review.
PubMed 40323503 DOI: 10.1007/s00726-025-03455-4
- Authors
- Yang H, Kuramochi Y, Sato S, Sakai R, Hayamizu K.
- Journal
- Amino acids
- Publication year
- 2025
- Study design
- Systematic review of oral safety studies in healthy people
- Participants
- 22 articles; 13 lacked adverse-event reporting
- Dose and intervention
- Several ornithine forms; dose interpretation must retain the salt
- Duration
- Durations varied; maximum 156 days concerned a different form
- Outcomes and their role in the study
- Adverse events, particularly gastrointestinal symptoms
- Findings
- The review estimated a 12 g/day no-observed-adverse-effect level for ornithine hydrochloride; pooled gastrointestinal-event difference was not significant.
- Limitations
- Incomplete reporting, heterogeneous preparations and short high-dose exposure. A no-observed-effect level is not an intake recommendation.
- Funding
- International Council on Amino Acid Science support.
- Conflict of Interest
- The authors declared no competing interests. The International Council on Amino Acid Science provided research funds, as disclosed in the acknowledgments.
- What We Can Learn
- Safety depends on the actual salt, dose and time studied—not the largest number in the abstract.
- Scope of source review
- Primary review methods, relevant results and disclosures checked on 2026-10-24. The review is not an additional trial independent of its included studies.
Cite this page
LÍFSVARÐA. L-Ornithine: What do fatigue, stress and sleep studies show in healthy adults? Version 1.0 / Updated 2026-10-24
https://lifsvarda.com/knowledge/l-ornithine/Edited by LÍFSVARÐA (product brand). Editorial policy
Primary Sources and updates
- Miyake M, Kirisako T, Kokubo T, Miura Y, Morishita K, Okamura H, Tsuda A. (2014). Randomised controlled trial of the effects of L-ornithine on stress markers and sleep quality in healthy workers. Nutrition journal DOI: 10.1186/1475-2891-13-53Original full text and bibliographic record reviewed.
- Moriyasu K, Nakajima A, Morita M. (2024). Effects of Oral Ingestion of L-Ornithine on Mental Stress and Fatigue Based on the Trier Social Stress Test in Healthy Humans: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Trial. Journal of clinical medicine DOI: 10.3390/jcm13247583Original full text and bibliographic record reviewed.
- Sugino T, Shirai T, Kajimoto Y, Kajimoto O. (2008). L-ornithine supplementation attenuates physical fatigue in healthy volunteers by modulating lipid and amino acid metabolism. Nutrition research (New York, N.Y.) DOI: 10.1016/j.nutres.2008.08.008Bibliographic record; not a detailed study appraisal.
- Fukuda T, Haraguchi A, Takahashi M, Nakaoka T, Fukazawa M, Okubo J, Ozaki M, Kanatome A, Ohya R, Miura Y, Obara K, Shibata S. (2018). A randomized, double-blind and placebo-controlled crossover trial on the effect of l-ornithine ingestion on the human circadian clock. Chronobiology international DOI: 10.1080/07420528.2018.1490315Bibliographic record; not a detailed study appraisal.
- Yang H, Kuramochi Y, Sato S, Sakai R, Hayamizu K. (2025). Safety assessment of L-ornithine oral intake in healthy subjects: a systematic review. Amino acids DOI: 10.1007/s00726-025-03455-4Primary review methods, relevant results and disclosures checked on 2026-10-24. The review is not an additional trial independent of its included studies.
- Miura N, Morishita K, Yasuda T, Akiduki S, Matsumoto H. (2023). Subchronic tolerance trials of graded oral supplementation with ornithine hydrochloride or citrulline in healthy adults. Amino acids DOI: 10.1007/s00726-022-03227-4Bibliographic record; not a detailed study appraisal.
- Nagayama C, Hamada Y, Kamemoto K, Hasumura T, Minegishi Y, Matsui Y, Ota N, Miyashita M. (2025). The effects of acute and chronic oral tea catechins and ornithine supplementation on exercise-induced ammonia accumulation and cycling performance in healthy young men: a randomized, double-blind, cross-over, placebo-controlled trial. European journal of applied physiology DOI: 10.1007/s00421-025-05833-yBibliographic record; not a detailed study appraisal.
- Kokubo T, Ikeshima E, Kirisako T, Miura Y, Horiuchi M, Tsuda A. (2013). A randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled crossover trial on the effects of L-ornithine on salivary cortisol and feelings of fatigue of flushers the morning after alcohol consumption. BioPsychoSocial medicine DOI: 10.1186/1751-0759-7-6Bibliographic record; not a detailed study appraisal.
- Ito N, Seki S, Ueda F. (2018). Effects of Composite Supplement Containing Collagen Peptide and Ornithine on Skin Conditions and Plasma IGF-1 Levels-A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Marine drugs DOI: 10.3390/md16120482Bibliographic record; not a detailed study appraisal.
- Butterworth RF, Kircheis G, Hilger N, McPhail MJW. (2018). Efficacy of l-Ornithine l-Aspartate for the Treatment of Hepatic Encephalopathy and Hyperammonemia in Cirrhosis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Journal of clinical and experimental hepatology DOI: 10.1016/j.jceh.2018.05.004Bibliographic record; not a detailed study appraisal.
First published: 2026-09-27 / Version 1.0. Sources reviewed 2026-09-27. Funding and conflicts are recorded separately; an unverified disclosure is not a declaration of no funding or no conflict.
