Key findings from detailed records
Population: 22 otherwise healthy adults with overweight or obesity Findings: Resistin differed significantly between groups. Leptin did not reach significance, and adipsin did not differ.
KNOWLEDGE RECORD
- Category
- Metabolism and cellular function
- Last Reviewed
Names and related search termsL-Carnosine / L-Carnosine / Carnosine / Carnosine
Study type: small exploratory studies.
OUTCOME-SPECIFIC EVIDENCE
Scientific Evidence Profile
Assessment pending
An outcome-specific assessment has not yet been completed. This is not a finding that the ingredient is ineffective. The study records below remain available.
This profile concerns the stated outcome and population, not the ingredient as a whole. It is not a probability of benefit, a safety rating, a product efficacy rating or an indication of product adoption.
How we assess evidenceIngredient Profile
- What is it?
- Carnosine is a dipeptide: beta-alanine joined to histidine. A dipeptide consists of two amino-acid units, rather than a long protein chain. [1]
Sources for this profile
Compound properties and formulation properties are different. These sources do not establish the efficacy of a finished supplement.
- PubChem — Carnosine (CID 439224) Chemical identity reference. Maintained by NCBI, U.S. National Library of Medicine. Database record; not a clinical trial.
Profile sources checked:
Read the evidence in context
- Evidence: what was measured in the stated population or experimental model.
- Inference: an interpretation connecting findings; its applicability depends on the study conditions.
- Hypothesis: a proposed explanation or effect that remains to be tested.
Why It Matters #
Can changes in metabolic hormones establish an anti-glycation effect? Check the detailed records for study conditions and use the literature map to compare other populations and outcomes.
What Was Studied #
22 otherwise healthy adults with overweight or obesity Additional analysis of a small randomized placebo-controlled trial. Outcomes: Blood resistin, leptin and adipsin. These additional analyses should not be equated with the parent trial's primary outcomes.[1]
What Was Found #
Resistin differed significantly between groups. Leptin did not reach significance, and adipsin did not differ.[1]
What the Evidence Means #
Multiple measures in a small sample. The study did not directly test prevention of AGE-related diseases or long-term health benefits.[1]
Comparing similar populations, formulations, durations and outcomes helps identify where findings agree and where they differ.
What We Can Learn #
Distinguish the proposed anti-glycation effect from the metabolic measures assessed in this study.
What Remains Unknown #
Further questions include reproducibility across populations and formulations, and the long-term balance of benefits and harms. Use the literature map as a starting point for these questions.
LITERATURE MAP / 10 PAPERS
Compare papers by conditions and findings.
A literature map covering different populations, outcomes and formulations. Read alongside detailed records to avoid treating one trial as the conclusion for an entire ingredient.
Selected: 2026-09-21. Bibliographic information checked against Europe PMC / PubMed. Editorial selection considered major papers and a range of populations and questions. This is not a systematic search covering all recent research.
10 RECORDS
A dash marks fields outside the bibliographic record. Use detailed records to compare findings and design records to connect mechanisms.
No papers match. Change the search conditions.
The literature map is an index of research questions and references. Individual assessment of results, doses, funding and COI is limited to the detailed study records. Related reports from the same trial may be included; paper counts are not counts of independent trials.
Explore the research Study Records
Listed doses describe study conditions, not recommended intake.
Carnosine Supplementation Improves Serum Resistin Concentrations in Overweight or Obese Otherwise Healthy Adults: A Pilot Randomized Trial.
PubMed 30205427DOI: 10.3390/nu10091258
- Authors
- Baye E, Ukropec J, de Courten MPJ, Mousa A, Kurdiova T, Johnson J, Wilson K, Plebanski M, Aldini G, Ukropcova B, de Courten B.
- Journal
- Nutrients
- Publication year
- 2018
- Study design
- Additional analysis of a small randomized placebo-controlled trial
- Participants
- 22 participants with available serum samples from a parent trial of 30 adults with overweight or obesity; 13 carnosine and 9 placebo.
- Dose and intervention
- Carnosine 2 g/day
- Duration
- 12 weeks
- Outcomes and their role in the study
- Blood resistin, leptin and adipsin. These additional analyses should not be equated with the parent trial's primary outcomes.
- Findings
- Resistin differed significantly between groups. Leptin did not reach significance, and adipsin did not differ.
- Limitations
- Multiple measures in a small sample. The study did not directly test prevention of AGE-related diseases or long-term health benefits.
- Funding
- Slovak research grants, Australian research organizations and others. Flamma S.p.A supplied carnosine.
- Conflict of Interest
- The authors declared no conflicts of interest. Ingredient supply is recorded separately.
- Scope of source review
- Relevant methods, results and disclosures checked on 2026-10-24. The parent trial is doi:10.1002/oby.21434; this report is an additional analysis, not an independent replication.
Cite this page
LÍFSVARÐA. L-Carnosine: Can changes in metabolic hormones establish an anti-glycation effect? Version 1.1 / Updated 2026-10-24
https://lifsvarda.com/knowledge/carnosine/Edited by LÍFSVARÐA (product brand).Editorial policy
Sources and updates
- Baye E, Ukropec J, de Courten MPJ, Mousa A, Kurdiova T, Johnson J, Wilson K, Plebanski M, Aldini G, Ukropcova B, de Courten B. (2018). Carnosine Supplementation Improves Serum Resistin Concentrations in Overweight or Obese Otherwise Healthy Adults: A Pilot Randomized Trial.Relevant methods, results and disclosures checked on 2026-10-24. The parent trial is doi:10.1002/oby.21434; this report is an additional analysis, not an independent replication.
First published: 2026-09-21 / Version 1.1. Updated 2026-09-23: Added a research comparison table and links to design records. Source notes identify the scope of verification when the full paper has not been reviewed. Research summaries and LÍFSVARÐA’s interpretation are distinguished.
