1 detailed study records

Key findings from detailed records

Population: Study A: 36 people newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes. Study B: 48 people with inadequately controlled blood glucose. Findings: Reductions in HbA1c and blood glucose were reported. Transient gastrointestinal symptoms were reported in 20 participants (34.5%) during the study.

KNOWLEDGE RECORD

Category
Metabolism and cellular function
Last Reviewed

Names and related search termsBerberine / Berberine

Study type: small exploratory studies.

Explore 10 papers by research question ↓

OUTCOME-SPECIFIC EVIDENCE

Scientific Evidence Profile

Assessment pending

An outcome-specific assessment has not yet been completed. This is not a finding that the ingredient is ineffective. The study records below remain available.

This profile concerns the stated outcome and population, not the ingredient as a whole. It is not a probability of benefit, a safety rating, a product efficacy rating or an indication of product adoption.

How we assess evidence

Ingredient Profile

What is it?
Berberine is an alkaloid—a nitrogen-containing natural compound. A purified compound and a plant extract containing it are different research materials. [1]
Sources for this profile

Compound properties and formulation properties are different. These sources do not establish the efficacy of a finished supplement.

  1. PubChem — Berberine (CID 2353) Chemical identity reference. Maintained by NCBI, U.S. National Library of Medicine. Database record; not a clinical trial.

Profile sources checked:

Read the evidence in context
  • Evidence: what was measured in the stated population or experimental model.
  • Inference: an interpretation connecting findings; its applicability depends on the study conditions.
  • Hypothesis: a proposed explanation or effect that remains to be tested.

Research Evidence · Scientific Synthesis

Why It Matters #

Do findings on blood glucose support use in healthy people? Check the detailed records for study conditions and use the literature map to compare other populations and outcomes.

What Was Studied #

Study A: 36 people newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes. Study B: 48 people with inadequately controlled blood glucose. Small pilot studies: a randomized active-controlled trial and an add-on study. Outcomes: HbA1c, blood glucose, lipids and other measures. The hierarchy of primary outcomes was not verified in the abstract.[1]

What Was Found #

Reductions in HbA1c and blood glucose were reported. Transient gastrointestinal symptoms were reported in 20 participants (34.5%) during the study.[1]

What the Evidence Means #

Small studies including an active comparator and an uncontrolled add-on intervention. They do not establish efficacy or safety equivalent to medication.[1]

Comparing similar populations, formulations, durations and outcomes helps identify where findings agree and where they differ.

What We Can Learn #

Do not use findings in patients with metabolic disorders to justify optimization in healthy people or replacement of medication.

What Remains Unknown #

Further questions include reproducibility across populations and formulations, and the long-term balance of benefits and harms. Use the literature map as a starting point for these questions.

LITERATURE MAP / 10 PAPERS

Compare papers by conditions and findings.

A literature map covering different populations, outcomes and formulations. Read alongside detailed records to avoid treating one trial as the conclusion for an entire ingredient.

Selected: 2026-09-21. Bibliographic information checked against Europe PMC / PubMed. Editorial selection considered major papers and a range of populations and questions. This is not a systematic search covering all recent research.

10 RECORDS

A dash marks fields outside the bibliographic record. Use detailed records to compare findings and design records to connect mechanisms.

Research comparison table
Paper and topicStudy conditionsFindings and scope
Metabolism and blood glucoseEfficacy of berberine in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.2008 Metabolism: clinical and experimentalPMID 18442638 #Study conditions

Small pilot studies: a randomized active-controlled trial and an add-on study

Population
Study A: 36 people newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes. Study B: 48 people with inadequately controlled blood glucose.
Dose
Berberine 0.5 g three times daily. Study A compared it with metformin.
Duration
3 months
Outcomes
HbA1c, blood glucose, lipids and other measures. The hierarchy of primary outcomes was not verified in the abstract.
Findings and scope

Reductions in HbA1c and blood glucose were reported. Transient gastrointestinal symptoms were reported in 20 participants (34.5%) during the study.

View findings and limitations

DOI

Authors

Yin J, Xing H, Ye J

Berberine is a novel cholesterol-lowering drug working through a unique mechanism distinct from statins.2004 Nature medicinePMID 15531889 #Study conditions

—

Findings and scope

—

Open original paper

DOI

Authors

Kong W, Wei J, Abidi P, Lin M, Inaba S, Li C et al.

Efficacy of Berberine in Patients with Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease.2015 PloS onePMID 26252777 #Study conditions

—

Findings and scope

—

Open original paper

DOI

Authors

Yan HM, Xia MF, Wang Y, Chang XX, Yao XZ, Rao SX et al.

Efficacy and safety of berberine for congestive heart failure secondary to ischemic or idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy.2003 The American journal of cardiologyPMID 12860219 #Study conditions

—

Findings and scope

—

Open original paper

DOI

Authors

Zeng XH, Zeng XJ, Li YY

A Randomized Clinical Trial of Berberine Hydrochloride in Patients with Diarrhea-Predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome.2015 Phytotherapy research : PTRPMID 26400188 #Study conditions

—

Findings and scope

—

Open original paper

DOI

Authors

Chen C, Tao C, Liu Z, Lu M, Pan Q, Zheng L et al.

Berberine ameliorates inflammation in patients with acute coronary syndrome following percutaneous coronary intervention.2012 Clinical and experimental pharmacology & physiologyPMID 22220931 #Study conditions

—

Findings and scope

—

Open original paper

DOI

Authors

Meng S, Wang LS, Huang ZQ, Zhou Q, Sun YG, Cao JT et al.

Long-term effects of nutraceuticals (berberine, red yeast rice, policosanol) in elderly hypercholesterolemic patients.2011 Advances in therapyPMID 22113535 #Study conditions

—

Findings and scope

—

Open original paper

DOI

Authors

Marazzi G, Cacciotti L, Pelliccia F, Iaia L, Volterrani M, Caminiti G et al.

Treatment of type 2 diabetes and dyslipidemia with the natural plant alkaloid berberine.2008 The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolismPMID 18397984 #Study conditions

—

Findings and scope

—

Open original paper

DOI

Authors

Zhang Y, Li X, Zou D, Liu W, Yang J, Zhu N et al.

Berberine versus placebo for the prevention of recurrence of colorectal adenoma: a multicentre, double-blinded, randomised controlled study.2020 The lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatologyPMID 31926918 #Study conditions

—

Findings and scope

—

Open original paper

DOI

Authors

Chen YX, Gao QY, Zou TH, Wang BM, Liu SD, Sheng JQ et al.

Combination of simvastatin with berberine improves the lipid-lowering efficacy.2008 Metabolism: clinical and experimentalPMID 18640378 #Study conditions

—

Findings and scope

—

Open original paper

DOI

Authors

Kong WJ, Wei J, Zuo ZY, Wang YM, Song DQ, You XF et al.

The literature map is an index of research questions and references. Individual assessment of results, doses, funding and COI is limited to the detailed study records. Related reports from the same trial may be included; paper counts are not counts of independent trials.

Explore the research Study Records

Listed doses describe study conditions, not recommended intake.

Study RecordPMID 18442638

Efficacy of berberine in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors
Yin J, Xing H, Ye J.
Journal
Metabolism: clinical and experimental
Publication year
2008
Study design
Small pilot studies: a randomized active-controlled trial and an add-on study
Participants
Study A: 36 people newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes. Study B: 48 people with inadequately controlled blood glucose.
Dose and intervention
Berberine 0.5 g three times daily. Study A compared it with metformin.
Duration
3 months
Outcomes and their role in the study
HbA1c, blood glucose, lipids and other measures. The hierarchy of primary outcomes was not verified in the abstract.
Findings
Reductions in HbA1c and blood glucose were reported. Transient gastrointestinal symptoms were reported in 20 participants (34.5%) during the study.
Limitations
Small studies including an active comparator and an uncontrolled add-on intervention. They do not establish efficacy or safety equivalent to medication.
Funding
Supported by Xinhua Hospital and partly by an NIH grant to J. Ye (Acknowledgments, PMC author manuscript).
Conflict of Interest
No separate author conflict-of-interest declaration was located in the available PMC author manuscript. This is not a declaration of no conflicts.
Scope of source review
Bibliographic information and abstract checked. The acknowledgments and availability of a separate conflict-of-interest statement were checked in the PMC author manuscript. A complete critical appraisal of the full paper remains pending.

Cite this page

LÍFSVARÐA. Berberine: Do findings on blood glucose support use in healthy people? Version 1.1 / Updated 2026-10-24

https://lifsvarda.com/knowledge/berberine/

Edited by LÍFSVARÐA (product brand).Editorial policy

Safety and interactions

Berberine can cause abdominal discomfort, constipation, diarrhea, nausea or vomiting. Avoid use during pregnancy or breastfeeding, and do not give it to infants. It can interact with medicines; discuss concurrent treatment with a clinician or pharmacist before use.

NCCIH — Berberine

Safety section reviewed: 2026-10-24.

Sources and updates

  1. Yin J, Xing H, Ye J. (2008). Efficacy of berberine in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.Bibliographic information and abstract checked. The acknowledgments and availability of a separate conflict-of-interest statement were checked in the PMC author manuscript. A complete critical appraisal of the full paper remains pending.

First published: 2026-09-21 / Version 1.1. Updated 2026-09-23: Added a research comparison table and links to design records. Source notes identify the scope of verification when the full paper has not been reviewed. Research summaries and LÍFSVARÐA’s interpretation are distinguished.