1 detailed study records

Key findings from detailed records

Population: 25,871 participants: men aged 50 or older and women aged 55 or older Findings: Cancer: HR 0.96 (95% CI 0.88–1.06); major cardiovascular events: HR 0.97 (0.85–1.12). Neither was significantly reduced.

KNOWLEDGE RECORD

Category
Vitamins and minerals
Last Reviewed

Names and related search termsVitamin D / Vitamin D / Cholecalciferol / D3

Study type: human intervention study.

Explore 10 papers by research question ↓

OUTCOME-SPECIFIC EVIDENCE

Scientific Evidence Profile

Assessment pending

An outcome-specific assessment has not yet been completed. This is not a finding that the ingredient is ineffective. The study records below remain available.

This profile concerns the stated outcome and population, not the ingredient as a whole. It is not a probability of benefit, a safety rating, a product efficacy rating or an indication of product adoption.

How we assess evidence

Ingredient Profile

What is it, and where is it found?
Vitamin D is fat-soluble. D2 and D3 are different forms; dietary intake and skin synthesis both contribute to vitamin D status. [1]
Sources for this profile

Compound properties and formulation properties are different. These sources do not establish the efficacy of a finished supplement.

  1. NIH Office of Dietary Supplements — VitaminD Nutrient identity and food-source reference. Published by NIH Office of Dietary Supplements. Reference synthesis; not an individual clinical trial.

Profile sources checked:

Read the evidence in context
  • Evidence: what was measured in the stated population or experimental model.
  • Inference: an interpretation connecting findings; its applicability depends on the study conditions.
  • Hypothesis: a proposed explanation or effect that remains to be tested.

Research Evidence · Scientific Synthesis

Why It Matters #

Is correcting a deficiency the same as preventing disease in a general population? Check the detailed records for study conditions and use the literature map to compare other populations and outcomes.

What Was Studied #

25,871 participants: men aged 50 or older and women aged 55 or older VITAL: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Outcomes: Invasive cancer and major cardiovascular events[1]

What Was Found #

Cancer: HR 0.96 (95% CI 0.88–1.06); major cardiovascular events: HR 0.97 (0.85–1.12). Neither was significantly reduced.[1]

What the Evidence Means #

The trial did not test treatment of deficiency and does not answer every question about bone health.[1]

Comparing similar populations, formulations, durations and outcomes helps identify where findings agree and where they differ.

What We Can Learn #

Distinguish nutritional requirements from the benefits of extra supplementation in people with adequate status.

What Remains Unknown #

Further questions include reproducibility across populations and formulations, and the long-term balance of benefits and harms. Use the literature map as a starting point for these questions.

LITERATURE MAP / 10 PAPERS

Compare papers by conditions and findings.

A literature map covering different populations, outcomes and formulations. Read alongside detailed records to avoid treating one trial as the conclusion for an entire ingredient.

Selected: 2026-09-21. Bibliographic information checked against Europe PMC / PubMed. Editorial selection considered major papers and a range of populations and questions. This is not a systematic search covering all recent research.

10 RECORDS

A dash marks fields outside the bibliographic record. Use detailed records to compare findings and design records to connect mechanisms.

Research comparison table
Paper and topicStudy conditionsFindings and scope
Cardiovascular and vascular outcomesVitamin D Supplements and Prevention of Cancer and Cardiovascular Disease.2019 The New England journal of medicinePMID 30415629 #Study conditions

VITAL: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Population
25,871 participants: men aged 50 or older and women aged 55 or older
Dose
Vitamin D3 2,000 IU/day
Duration
Median 5.3 years
Outcomes
Invasive cancer and major cardiovascular events
Findings and scope

Cancer: HR 0.96 (95% CI 0.88–1.06); major cardiovascular events: HR 0.97 (0.85–1.12). Neither was significantly reduced.

View findings and limitations

DOI

Authors

Manson JE, Cook NR, Lee IM, Christen W, Bassuk SS, Mora S et al.

Effect of calcium and vitamin D supplementation on bone density in men and women 65 years of age or older.1997 The New England journal of medicinePMID 9278463 #Study conditions

—

Findings and scope

—

Open original paper

DOI

Authors

Dawson-Hughes B, Harris SS, Krall EA, Dallal GE

Human serum 25-hydroxycholecalciferol response to extended oral dosing with cholecalciferol.2003 The American journal of clinical nutritionPMID 12499343 #Study conditions

—

Findings and scope

—

Open original paper

DOI

Authors

Heaney RP, Davies KM, Chen TC, Holick MF, Barger-Lux MJ

Effect of four monthly oral vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) supplementation on fractures and mortality in men and women living in the community: randomised double blind controlled trial.2003 BMJ (Clinical research ed.)PMID 12609940 #Study conditions

—

Findings and scope

—

Open original paper

DOI

Authors

Trivedi DP, Doll R, Khaw KT

Randomized trial of vitamin D supplementation to prevent seasonal influenza A in schoolchildren.2010 The American journal of clinical nutritionPMID 20219962 #Study conditions

—

Findings and scope

—

Open original paper

DOI

Authors

Urashima M, Segawa T, Okazaki M, Kurihara M, Wada Y, Ida H

Effects of a vitamin D and leucine-enriched whey protein nutritional supplement on measures of sarcopenia in older adults, the PROVIDE study: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.2015 Journal of the American Medical Directors AssociationPMID 26170041 #Study conditions

—

Findings and scope

—

Open original paper

DOI

Authors

Bauer JM, Verlaan S, Bautmans I, Brandt K, Donini LM, Maggio M et al.

Vitamin D Supplementation and Prevention of Type 2 Diabetes.2019 The New England journal of medicinePMID 31173679 #Study conditions

—

Findings and scope

—

Open original paper

DOI

Authors

Pittas AG, Dawson-Hughes B, Sheehan P, Ware JH, Knowler WC, Aroda VR et al.

Calcium plus vitamin D supplementation and the risk of fractures.2006 The New England journal of medicinePMID 16481635 #Study conditions

—

Findings and scope

—

Open original paper

DOI

Authors

Jackson RD, LaCroix AZ, Gass M, Wallace RB, Robbins J, Lewis CE et al.

Vitamin D and calcium supplementation reduces cancer risk: results of a randomized trial.2007 The American journal of clinical nutritionPMID 17556697 #Study conditions

—

Findings and scope

—

Open original paper

DOI

Authors

Lappe JM, Travers-Gustafson D, Davies KM, Recker RR, Heaney RP

Vitamin D supplementation improves cytokine profiles in patients with congestive heart failure: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.2006 The American journal of clinical nutritionPMID 16600924 #Study conditions

—

Findings and scope

—

Open original paper

DOI

Authors

Schleithoff SS, Zittermann A, Tenderich G, Berthold HK, Stehle P, Koerfer R

The literature map is an index of research questions and references. Individual assessment of results, doses, funding and COI is limited to the detailed study records. Related reports from the same trial may be included; paper counts are not counts of independent trials.

Explore the research Study Records

Listed doses describe study conditions, not recommended intake.

Study RecordPMID 30415629

Vitamin D Supplements and Prevention of Cancer and Cardiovascular Disease.

Authors
Manson JE, Cook NR, Lee IM, Christen W, Bassuk SS, Mora S, Gibson H, Gordon D, Copeland T, D'Agostino D, Friedenberg G, Ridge C, Bubes V, Giovannucci EL, Willett WC, Buring JE, VITAL Research Group.
Journal
The New England journal of medicine
Publication year
2019
Study design
VITAL: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
Participants
25,871 participants: men aged 50 or older and women aged 55 or older
Dose and intervention
Vitamin D3 2,000 IU/day
Duration
Median 5.3 years
Outcomes and their role in the study
Invasive cancer and major cardiovascular events
Findings
Cancer: HR 0.96 (95% CI 0.88–1.06); major cardiovascular events: HR 0.97 (0.85–1.12). Neither was significantly reduced.
Limitations
The trial did not test treatment of deficiency and does not answer every question about bone health.
Funding
NIH funded VITAL. Pharmavite supplied vitamin D and Pronova BioPharma/BASF supplied fish oil and matching placebos; Quest Diagnostics provided assays. NIH collaborated in design, conduct and interpretation; final decisions remained with the investigators.
Conflict of Interest
The available author manuscript states that all authors submitted ICMJE disclosure forms. The individual forms were not reviewed here; this is not a statement that no conflicts existed. Study funding and donated products are identified above.
Scope of source review
Relevant methods, results, safety and funding in the primary author manuscript checked on 2026-10-24. Individual ICMJE forms remain unchecked.

Cite this page

LÍFSVARÐA. Vitamin D: Is correcting a deficiency the same as preventing disease in a general population? Version 1.1 / Updated 2026-10-24

https://lifsvarda.com/knowledge/vitamin-d/

Edited by LÍFSVARÐA (product brand).Editorial policy

Safety and interactions

Count vitamin D from all supplements. Excess intake can cause high blood calcium and kidney injury. Kidney impairment, hyperparathyroidism or thiazide use warrants clinical advice before supplementation. Deficiency treatment may require individualized dosing and monitoring; a trial dose is not a universal daily recommendation.

NIH ODS

Safety section reviewed: 2026-10-24.

Sources and updates

  1. Manson JE, Cook NR, Lee IM, Christen W, Bassuk SS, Mora S, Gibson H, Gordon D, Copeland T, D'Agostino D, Friedenberg G, Ridge C, Bubes V, Giovannucci EL, Willett WC, Buring JE, VITAL Research Group. (2019). Vitamin D Supplements and Prevention of Cancer and Cardiovascular Disease.Relevant methods, results, safety and funding in the primary author manuscript checked on 2026-10-24. Individual ICMJE forms remain unchecked.

First published: 2026-09-21 / Version 1.1. Updated 2026-09-23: Added a research comparison table and links to design records. Source notes identify the scope of verification when the full paper has not been reviewed. Research summaries and LÍFSVARÐA’s interpretation are distinguished.